Rusticus (male) mid sixth century (from: --/--/553 to: --/--/553) View Case
553 - ? (from: --/--/553 to: --/--/--)
Roma [Rome]
Antinoopolis [El Sheikh Ibada]
unknown
Felix
Interactions
Interaction Date
553 - ? (from: --/--/553 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Antinoopolis [El Sheikh Ibada]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
support
Associates of Rusticus and Felix
Interactions
Interaction Date
553 - ? (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Antinoopolis [El Sheikh Ibada]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Victor of Tunnuna, chronica 553.1 (MGH auct. ant. 11:203)
Rusticus, contra Acephalos disputatio pr. (PL 67:1170B)
ACO 2.3.3, XII-XXIII
Cataphrygians (unknown) (from: --/--/-- to: --/--/--) View Case
between 401 and 407 - ? (from: --/--/401 to: --/--/--)
Roma [Rome]
unknown monastery [n/a]
unknown
Innocentius of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
between 401 and 407 (from: --/--/401 to: --/--/407)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Bishop of Rome
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
cleric
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Bishop of Rome (between 401 and 407)
Liber Pontificalis 42 (Duchesne I:220)
https://archive.org/stream/duchesne01/duchesne1#page/n509/mode/2up
https://archive.org/stream/bookofpopesliber00loom#page/84/mode/2up
Eulalius (male) early fifth century (from: --/--/418 to: --/--/423) View Case
8/2/419 - 18/3/419 (from: 8/2/419 to: 18/3/419)
Roma [Rome]
yes
Flavius Honorius
Interactions
Interaction Date
15/1/419 - 10/4/419 (from: 15/1/419 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Emperor (15/1/419 - 10/4/419)
Aurelius Anicius Symmachus
Interactions
Interaction Date
29/3/419 - 10/4/419 (from: 29/3/419 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
praefectus urbis Romae
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
praefectus urbis Romae (29/3/419 - 10/4/419)
corporati and maiores regionum
Interactions
Interaction Date
29/3/419 - 10/4/419 (from: 29/3/419 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Flavius Honorius
Interactions
Interaction Date
3/4/419 - 10/4/419 (from: 3/4/419 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Office
Emperor
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
lay
Relationship Quality
conflict
Responsible for exile (or exile threat)
Yes
Emperor (3/4/419 - 10/4/419)
people and clergy of Rome
Interactions
Interaction Date
423 (from: --/--/423 to: --/--/--)
Interaction Location
Roma [Rome]
Office
Religious Affiliation (at time of relationship with exile)
Religious Status (at time of relationship with exile)
unknown
Relationship Quality
support
Other Interaction Type
Yes (informants of death of rival)
collectio Avellana 20-29 (CSEL 35.1:61-5) https://archive.org/stream/epistulaeimperat01gnth#page/66/mode/2up
Liber Pontificalis 44 (Duchesne I:89-92) https://archive.org/stream/bookofpopesliber00loom#page/88/mode/2up